Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Year range
1.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-217967

ABSTRACT

Background: This experiment has been designed for you to learn more about the way the cardiovascular system how it respond toward exercise. The prevalence of cardiovascular disease and its resultant debilitation of cardiac performance are expected to increase in the future generation. Eelier research on cardiovascular adaptations to endurance training has primarily focused on young generation. Recent work on the present study indicates that the basis of trained older male’s increased aerobic power is their superior ability to increase stroke volume during exercise, which, in turn, allows them to marked increase in cardiac output. Aims and Objectives: The aim of the study was to assess the differences in cardiovascular responses to exercise in trained and untrained individuals. Materials and Methods: In this, 100 subjects were included and divided into trained (50) and untrained (50) for a minimum of 1 year duration by the time of study and 50 untrained individuals acted as controls. Institution ethics committee permission obtained and the subjects performed four exercise sessions per week for a minimum of 1 year duration by the time of study; supervised by the personal trainers at gym center, according to instructions. Results: The mean resting heart rate (HR) of strength trained was lesser when compared to mean resting HR of untrained. Conclusion: Regular strength training exercise results in a decrease in weight, body fat, resistance of insulin, triglycerides, and an increase in excess good cholesterol levels. Regular strength training exercise if performed within normal limits decreases cardiovascular risk factors.

2.
Article | IMSEAR | ID: sea-217513

ABSTRACT

Background: Measurement of arterial blood pressure (BP) is one of the routine procedures performed both in outpatient and inpatient services of the hospital. Even though BP estimation is routinely done, its values are vital to assess the health status of the patients. Accurate recordings of BP can be estimated by adhering to all the precautions and instructions relating to the specific method employed for BP measurement. In recent years, many health-care setups are replacing the traditional manual BP apparatus with automated machines (digital) for BP estimation. Hence, there is a need to compare these two techniques in relation to their accuracy. Aims and Objectives: In a quest to replace manual mercury sphygmomanometers with automated machines, there is a need to see the reliability of automated machines of BP measurements especially which are currently available in India. Hence, the present study will help us to see the accuracy of automated machines by simultaneously comparing them with manual mercury sphygmomanometer. Materials and Methods: A total of around 224 patients which include 124 males and 100 females within the age group of 25–35 years are recruited for the study. Informed consent was taken from all the subjects. Institute ethical clearance was obtained before conducting the research study. Both manual and automated BP apparatus were used for BP recording. Results: The mean systolic BP (SBP) recorded in males using the mercury sphygmomanometer was found to be 113.19 ± 10.60 mmHg, 113.08 ± 10.08 mmHg, and 117.16 ± 11.14 mmHg, and the mean diastolic BP (DBP) was found to be 68.76 ± 8.34 mmHg, 70.50 ± 8.66 mmHg, and 72.69 ± 8.35 mmHg in sitting, standing, and recumbent postures, respectively. The mean SBP recorded using digital sphygmomanometer was found to be 113.90 ± 10.93 mmHg, 117.24 ± 10.23 mmHg, and 117.16 ± 11.14 mmHg and the mean DBP recorded was found to be to be 68.50±8.43 mmHg, 70.50 ± 8.66 mmHg, and 72.39±7.89 mmHg in sitting, standing, and recumbent postures, respectively. The difference between mean SBP and DBPs in males recorded using the two devices was found to be statistically insignificant. Similarly, the difference between mean SBP and DBP in females recorded using the two devices was not statistically significant. Conclusion: From the above results, it is concluded that there were no significant differences in recorded values of manual mercury sphygmomanometer and automated digital sphygmomanometer.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL